This morning I received a message from an article site, that we won't name. These were telling me that they are excited to allow me know that my article have been approved and that it had been now live. Getting the notice didn't excite me. And I had already decided that I would never submit articles to them again. After hearing the backdrop, you may realise why. Additionally, you will learn to choose article directory sites for SEO purposes in the process.
The article have been submitted over 3 months prior. The very first time I emailed support at this particular directory, I reminded them that the fourteen days for evaluating the submission was past. I additionally made it clear which i was evaluating remarkable ability to deliver on the promises before I considered paying for a premium membership.
A month later, the article was still pending. I emailed a second time asking when they were going to approve the content. I almost pulled the article, but after checking their author's guidelines, I realized that I possibly could post the article on the blog I was establishing for the article's niche. I posted the content around the blog and decided to see how long they'd take.
Why am I sharing this article directory story of woe?
When choosing which article directory sites you will post your well-written article on, you need to consider several factors. Even if an article directory shows up on the listing of the "best article directories" on the internet, there might be more you need to know before you decide to post your articles on that site. This website was in the top five on several lists.
In order to evaluate articles directory's quality, you must do some investigation. Here are a few important questions you should ask.
Does the directory ask you for a fee to post articles, or to get better service?
A great article directory must have a free option that permits you to see whether their directory produces the outcomes you are seeking. In return for lacking to pay anything, you should expect the review process to take between 7 days to Fourteen days.
If the article directory does not have your article submissions live within the time frame it promises, how can you trust the directory's word that it only accepts the very best quality articles? If a directory is really swamped it can't review free submissions on time, then there's a real risk that anybody who is willing to pay for the membership fee can get their Round-the-clock review in the cost of quality.
I believe that the article directory that requires authors to submit the absolute minimum quantity of articles for review before an author is allowed to purchase "premium author" rights is really a directory that is committed to making certain the work it publishes meets a particular standard. This is a practice that can prevent non-authors from gaming the machine.
Would be the articles around the directory of excellent quality?
Generally, the caliber of the articles within an article directory reflects the value of posting on the directory. You can expect every article directory to have some articles that slip through after an author has achieved their expert author status, or whatever title the directory gives to somebody who has submitted the absolute minimum number of articles for review. Sometimes writers slack off after they've attained "status."
What you are searching for are directories in which the articles aren't advertisements, are well written and aren't stuffed with keywords. There are lots of who have good reputations. And also the recent Google changes don't necessary reflect which ones these are. Skip round the site for various topics. If you discover good content on each search phrase, then you are probably on the good article site.
Can articles be submitted without dealing with review?
Watch out for sites that don't take a look at articles before they're going live. A website that does not review the quality of submissions is potentially a website that Google will see like a "content farm." The best article sites are struggling with Google's latest "farm" algorithms. Don't expect sites that do not monitor the caliber of their material to help you with long-term positive SEO goals.
Does your directory require your submissions to become your original work?
It should. Some directories go so far as to want you to haven't published your article elsewhere on the internet. This services the directory well by giving it link supremacy with Google.
If you are seeking primary link authority, you might would rather use directories where you can publish your article like a blog post in addition to submit it for publication on their article site. Which strategy works well with you will depend on in which you expect to get a most traffic from. For some businesses, a blog must be a principal SEO strategy, while for others article promotion is more successful at generating leads. If your primary focus is B2B then your blog might be your best strategy unless you can publish articles in trade journals. For a B2C company, article marketing can be quite successful.
Either in scenario, it is essential that the directories you publish to do not accept private label rights articles and do NOT accept revised content (even of your own articles). You need to only submit your posts to directories that expect you to provide articles with new and fresh material.
The caliber of the content directories you decide to work with determines the long-term success of your article marketing efforts. Don't settle for not directories that pass the screening provided whenever you answer these questions.